Tuesday, 24 September 2013

Music Sharing





How Music Sharing Benefits Out Weigh The Negatives.

Music sharing is one of the most controversially debated topics of the last half-decade. Since the

emerge of the Sopa bill (Stop Online Piracy Act) introduced in 2011 by the United States

Government, music sharing has become one of the most talked about topics of today with artists

speaking out against this bill and also acting as activists for and against online music sharing. There

are great benefits and negatives that come from file sharing which have an effect on all people,

including famous stars and your average Joe blow, being the reason why this issue has had so much

exposure in the last few years. Personally I am completely for music sharing online unless it is for

personal gain. I am a musician myself and I feel that music sharing in the sense that it is used to

connect people together and reach those whom it may not have without file sharing is something I

completely support and will continue to support, yet file sharing for a personal financial gain from

others work is something I stand strongly against.                                                                                                                                          

Money, Cash, Profit.

In the recent years of online sharing, music labels and industry conglomerates have scrambled to find

a way to keep the money pouring in from artists releases and with the undeniable decline of record

sales due to online music sharing, artist's and industry heads have found a new niche to pick at – live

shows. Live shows have become the major income for most music labels and independent artist's, not

necessarily because the artist's love to tour or play live but essentially because that's the only way to

make real ends meat in todays world. That is mainly the reason behind why we are seeing the

reunion tours of many older bands in recent times. Interestingly enough, you have many successful

bands agreeing to this new move in the industry and supporting the fact that making a living from

creating and releasing music boils down to how many people come to your show.



                                                  
Notably, a very successful artist by the name of Dave Grohl agreed with the fact that – yes people do

share music for free and yes there is no way around that, in-fact he actually had this to say about the

issue:

 "I think it’s a good idea because it’s people trading music. It has nothing to do with industry or 

finance, it’s just people that want music and there’s nothing wrong with that. It’s the same as

someone turning on the fucking radio, it’s the same as someone putting a cassette in a cassette deck

when the BBC plays a special radio session. I don’t think it’s a crime, it’s been going on for years. It’s

 the same as people making tapes for each other. The industry is more threatened by it because it’s  

the worldwide web and it’s a broader scope of trading, but I don’t think it’s such a fucking horrible 

thing. The first thing we should do is get all the fucking millionaires to shut their mouths, stop 

bitching about the 25 cents a time they’re losing." The only issue I would raise here would be the

fact that Dave is not one of the most financially successfully artist because of touring and doing

shows but his success comes from his record sales, according to Piggy Salary, Dave Grohl profited a

sweet $6,013,257 in the year 2012 and has a net-worth of around about $200,000,000. So seeing

those numbers, I personally wouldn't give a hoot if there were a few thousand downloads of my

music on a Torrent site either.

But what's the stance of a band that is not quite as successful as Grohl on this issue you might ask?

Well most bands would tell you that yes; tours and shows are the way to really keep the band going

financially but are not really all that happy with it. Here is a little insight from an internationally

renowned New Zealand band called Unknown Mortal Orchestra;




it's more than money when you buy an album. Better album sales means happier label, happier 

booking agent, happier management and that means more productive band that gets to play in more 

towns and put out more records. When you send me a message that say 'Why aren't/haven't you 

played in my town? Best believe that whether or not you actually bought the album has more impact 

on that than you might think." So, taking a piece from each side of the spectrum, we understand that

artist's (the not so wealthy ones) are not exactly happy with the fact that they must preform more

than they would have had to twenty years ago to keep themselves financially relevant and that the

lack of record sales could be detrimental to the band as a whole but as an entirety we as artist's have

all accepted these circumstances of today, in-fact these circumstances of applying more work

towards your musical career is a huge benefit to the quality of music being produced.


The Result Of Online Sharing

Understanding that the result of music sharing online has caused the industry to become tighter

financially also brings forth a positive irony. YouTube and other forms of music outlets online have

opened the doors to those who's music would have never seen the light of day without these online

mediums but because of this, understandably, there has been a huge flood of music released to the

public that has never been seen before in other periods of time. The irony of this is that with all the

new music emerging daily to the public, it has made record labels follow closely and become quite

picky as to the artist's they choose to invest in. Online sharing has, I believe unintentionally,

increased the level of quality expected by the record labels. So to become noticed by a musical

investor, the artist really has to be one of a kind and quite unique in a sea full of new musicians,

resulting in better quality of music being pushed with promotion to the public. It also has upped the

level of work ethic within musicians globally, instead of making one demo tape and expecting a

record deal, artist's now have to release bodies of work independently online through one of the

many online mediums, create a following online and within local towns, play more gig's and

essentially put a whole heap more work in -  opposed to what the standard was before online sharing,

being a lot less box's to tick off the “grind list. “So essentially, online sharing has upped the level

immensely on artist's and those who do eventually make it to the top are usually the ones who have

worked the hardest, you could say it brings a higher level of respect to an occupation seen across the

world as easy and fun.





                                                  
To Sum Up

As I obviously stated throughout this piece, I am a huge supporter of online sharing and getting

music across to audiences who may never have been able to reach it without these online mediums

but stand strongly against any financial gain made by individuals on behalf of another person’s art.

 Online sharing initially seemed to bring destruction to the world of music but as we progress on and

learn to live with the circumstances surrounding the world of music and online sharing, we begin to

realise that online sharing and trading between one and another has brought a new light into an

already closed, difficult industry, it has brought the work ethic and determination out of musicians, it

has also created a global music community in which can only grow into a very bright future and it 

has also brought the quality essence back into the life of music.



                          







References:

http://lawlibrary.case.edu/2012/01/18/sopa-pipa-anti-piracy-legislation-issue-backgrounder/

http://netforbeginners.about.com/od/peersharing/a/torrenthandbook.htm

http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/record-label.htm

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0342970/

http://www.piggysalary.com/musicians/dave-grohl-net-worth-and-salary/

https://www.facebook.com/unknownmortalorchestra/posts/484822881559758

http://unknownmortalorchestra.com/

http://www.upvenue.com/article/1590-musician-stances-on-music-piracy.html

http://torrentfreak.com/why-pirates-buy-more-music-and-music-labels-fail-090428/

http://webpages.scu.edu/ftp/jronen/FRPNapsterKazaa.htm

http://www.recruitingblogs.com/profiles/blogs/why-quality-wins-over-quantity-when-it-comes-
to-job-searching

http://wordsandthoughtsandtales.wordpress.com/tag/dave-grohl/

http://www.djinseattle.com/check-out-my-youtube-channel/

http://blog.lockdata.com/what-is-the-sharing-economy/

http://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/jan/27/unknown-mortal-orchestra-ii-review